ISSN - 0973-0958

Pediatric Oncall Journal

Limb Body Wall Complex (LBWC) 01/09/2014 00:00:00 https://www.pediatriconcall.com/Journal/images/journal_cover.jpg

Limb Body Wall Complex (LBWC)

Ashwin Borade1, Ashwin S. Prabhu1, Geeta S. Prabhu2, Sasanga R. Prabhu2.
1Department of Pediatrics, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India,
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sangeeth Nursing Home, Kochi, India.

ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE
Dr. Ashwin Borade, C/O Dr. Geeta S. Prabhu, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, "Sangeeth" Nursing Home, South Cherlai, Kochi, Kerala 682002, India.
Email: ashwinborade@yahoo.com
Abstract
Limb Body wall complex (LBWC) is a rare abdominal wall defect due to failure of the development of the body stalk. The incidence at birth is about 0.32 per 1, 00,000 births because of subsequent intrauterine deaths (1). We report a primigravida who presented at 26 weeks with ultrasonographic feature of LBWC. After termination of pregnancy; evaluation confirmed the anomaly of the lower embryonic parts consistent with the diagnosis of LBWC.
 
Keywords
Limb body wall complex, Placento-abdominal adhesion, Body wall defects.
 
Introduction
LBWC is sporadic, lethal abnormality characterized by severe body-wall defects with evisceration of the organs caused by the failure to form a body stalk. LBWC also known as Body Stalk Anomaly is characterized by severe scoliosis, severe pulmonary hypoplasia and giant omphalocele. The prognosis of the disease is poor and most obstetricians consider it fatal (2,3).

We present this rare congenital malformation complex highlighting the importance of early sonographic imaging findings in LBWC along with differentiation from other anterior abdominal wall defects.
 
Case Report
A 20 years old primigravida presented at 26wks gestation with anomaly scan report of fetus having abdominal wall defect with positional deformities and severe scoliosis. It was a first pregnancy of non-consanguineous marriage. The antenatal period was uneventful. A provisional diagnosis of LBWC was made. After explaining poor prognosis and family counseling, patient was posted for termination of pregnancy as a high-risk case. The fetus weighed 500 gm including the placenta, which was adherent to the skin margin of the anterior body wall defect. The proposita had complex fetoplacental malformation pattern with multiple congenital anomalies. Also evident were associated exencephaly, cleft palate and bilateral anophthalmos. He survived for only few minutes after birth. The most obvious features included a huge abdominal wall defect that caused evisceration of liver, stomach and the intestines. Abdominal viscera were attached directly to the placenta and were covered by ruptured sac of amnion. A rather short and broad body stalk connected the fetus to the placenta [Figure 1]. The umbilical vessels were one artery and a vein which was connecting the skin margin of the anterior body wall defect. Other abnormal features included low set misshapen and elongated ears, compressed nose, high arched palate and receded chin. Thorax was small and bell-shaped with scoliosis of the spine. The lower limbs had developed unequally and were malpositioned. Left leg was more hypoplastic with flexion contracture at the knee joint. Our patient showed the placento-abdominal adhesion phenotype. Because of the fatal nature of the disease and unwillingness of parents further investigations were not performed in this case.

Limb body wall complex
<b>Limb body wall complex
</b>
 
Discussion
Portal in 1685 described cases of structural defects involving limb and midline body wall anomalies (4). Limb body wall complex was described for the first time by Van Allen et al in 1987 (5). LBWC was also referred to as "congenital absence of the umbilical cord", "cyllosomus and pleurosomus" and "body stalk anomaly" (5,6,7). But in 1993, Russo et al published a critical review of the literature on limb-body wall complex, hypothesizing that the 2 limb-body wall complex phenotypes (with and without craniofacial defects) may represent different entities, with different pathogeneses. The phenotype including craniofacial defects would be caused by early vascular disruption and amnion rupture; a view also based on the frequent observation of typical constrictive amniotic bands. In contrast, limb-body wall complex without craniofacial defects, a phenotype in reality representing the body stalk anomaly, would be related to intrinsic embryonal maldevelopment, the defective folding process of the embryonic disk (8). The two phenotypes have been described as placento-cranial and placento-abdominal adhesions (3,9). There is no sex or familial predilection or known recurrence risk (3). The exact etiology of LBWC is not clear. Smith et al have suggested that LBWC results from amnion rupture caused by vascular or mechanical compression occurring between third and fifth weeks (10). The etiology includes embryonic dysplasia, exposure to teratogenic drugs and use of oral pills (9).

LBWC is a polymalformative fetal malformation syndrome with the essential features of exencephaly / encephalocele with facial clefts, thoraco- and / or abdominoschisis and limb defects. For diagnosis two or three of above features are required. ln our proposita, the two diagnostic features were abdominoschisis and limb defects, further supported by severe scoliosis of the spine. Other defects include cardiac defects, bowel atresia, renal agenesis / dysplasia, urogenital anomalies, absent or short umbilical cord etc (9,10). Limb defects in LBWC are seen in 96% cases and include club foot (32%), oligodactyly (12%), arthrogryposis/web (12%), absent limb (9%), single forearm bone (8%), single lower leg bone (6%), pseudosyndactyly (5%), split hand/foot (5%), radial/ulnar hypoplasia (4%), rotational defect (4%), and preaxial poly-dactyly (3%) (3,12). Other malformations include absent diaphragm (74%), abnormal pulmonary lobulations (50%), trilobulated liver (4%), polysplenia (4%), absent gall bladder (29%), amniotic bands (40%) and single umbilical artery. Cardiac malformations reported are primitive ventricle (53%), common atrium (46%), truncus arteriosus (23%), atrial septal defect (15%), membranous VSD (8%), hypoplastic right ventricle (8%) and ectopia cordis (8%). Gastrointestinal anomalies seen are nonrotated intestine (96%), intestinal atresia (22%), anal atresia (17%), shorted intestines (4%) and Ladd's bands (4%). Renal abnormalities reported are unilateral absent kidney (30%), bilateral absent kidney (4%), hydronephrosis (17%), renal dysplasia (9%), and hypoplastic kidneys (4%). Urogenital abnormalities seen are abnormal external genitalia (32%), absent gonad (30%) and extrophy of bladder (4%) (2,9).

Prenatal diagnosis is possible by detection of very high maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and by transvaginal ultrasound examination at the end of the first gestational trimester (1,3,6). The ultrasonographic features are a major abdominal wall defect, severe kyphoscoliosis, a short or absent or rudimentary umbilical cord and limb abnormalities (3,13). The colour flow imaging demonstrates single umbilical artery with abnormal fetoplacental attachment (3). LBWC is an almost uniformly lethal and must therefore be distinguished from other nonlethal fetal abdominal wall defects, such as gastroschisis or omphalocele (8). Gastroschisis is usually an isolated right paraumbilical defect, easy to diagnose. The differential diagnosis of omphalocele may be more challenging because this midline defect is frequently associated with other anomalies.

Early diagnosis can be followed by medical termination of the pregnancy. We highlight this case for it's rarity and also suggest attention should be given for early ultrasonographic diagnosis of this anomaly.

Contributors: ASP reviewed the literature and drafted the initial manuscript. AB was involved in designing the article, revision of manuscript. GSP was involved in designing the article, revision of manuscript and will act as a guarantor for the paper. SRP were involved in the management of the patient and in critical revision of the manuscript.

Competing Interest: None
 
Contributor Statement
ASP reviewed the literature and drafted the initial manuscript. AB was involved in designing the article, revision of manuscript. GSP was involved in designing the article, revision of manuscript and will act as a guarantor for the paper. SRP were involved in the management of the patient and in critical revision of the manuscript.
 
Acknowledgement
None
 
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Funding
None
 
Conflict of Interest None
 
  1. Mann L, Ferguson-Smith MA, Desai M, Gibson AA, Raine PA. Prenatal assessment of anterior abdominal wall defects and their prognosis. Prenat Diagn. 1984; 4: 427-435.  [CrossRef]
  2. Kanamori Y, Hashizume K, Sugiyama M, Tomonaga T, Takayasu H, Ishimaru T, et al. Long-term survival of a baby with body stalk anomaly: report of a case. Surg Today. 2007; 37: 30-33.  [CrossRef]
  3. D'Souza J, Indrajit IK, Menon S. Limb Body Wall Complex. MJAFI 2004; 60: 77-80.  [CrossRef]
  4. Patten RM, Van Allen M, Mack LA, Wilson D, Nyberg D, Hirsch J, et al. Limb-body wall complex: in utero sonographic diagnosis of a complicated fetal malformation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986; 146: 1019-1024.  [CrossRef]
  5. Van Allen MI, Curry C, Gallagher L. Limb body wall complex: I. Pathogenesis. Am J Med Genet. 1987; 28: 529-448.  [CrossRef]
  6. Angtuaco TL. Fetal Anterior Abdominal Wall Defects. In: Callen PW (ed). Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 4th edn. Philadelphia, Saunders. 2000: 507-512.
  7. Lockwood CJ, Scioscia AL, Hobbins JC. Congenital absence of the umbilical cord resulting from maldevelopment of embryonic body folding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 155:1049-1051.  [CrossRef]
  8. Russo R, D'Armiento M, Angrisani P, Vecchione R. Limb body wall complex: a critical review and a nosological proposal. Am J Med Genet. 1993; 47: 893-900.  [CrossRef]
  9. Managoli S, Chaturvedi P, Vilhekar KY, Gagane N. Limb body wall complex. Indian Pediatr. 2003; 40: 891-894.  [PubMed]
  10. Smith DW. Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation, 3rd ed, Philadelphia, Saunders. 1981: 488-496.
  11. Colpaert C, Bogers J, Hertveldt K, Loquet P, Dumon J, Willems P. Limb-body wall complex: 4 new cases illustrating the importance of examining placenta and umbilical cord. Pathol Res Pract. 2000; 196: 783-790.  [CrossRef]
  12. Van Allen MI, Curry C, Walden CE, Gallagher L, Patten RM. Limb-body wall complex: II. Limb and spine defects. Am J Med Genet. 1987; 28: 549-565.  [CrossRef]
  13. Patten RM, Van Allen M, Mack LA, Wilson D, Nyberg D, Hirsch J, et al. Limb-body wall complex: in utero sonographic diagnosis of a complicated fetal malformation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986; 146: 1019-1024.  [CrossRef]


Cite this article as:
Borade A, Prabhu A S, Prabhu G S, Prabhu S R. Limb body wall complex (LBWC). Pediatr Oncall J. 2009;6: 45-46.
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Disclaimer: The information given by www.pediatriconcall.com is provided by medical and paramedical & Health providers voluntarily for display & is meant only for informational purpose. The site does not guarantee the accuracy or authenticity of the information. Use of any information is solely at the user's own risk. The appearance of advertisement or product information in the various section in the website does not constitute an endorsement or approval by Pediatric Oncall of the quality or value of the said product or of claims made by its manufacturer.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0